Thursday, March 27, 2008
The Smashing Pumpkins live at Hordern Pavilion, March 27
The show began half an hour before its scheduled time, resulting in around 80% of late-comers, including ourselves. We ran inside just as Tonight, Tonight was wrapping up, only to learn the three songs we'd missed were from the band's latest album, Zeitgeist. Phew.
But I'm not going to do a review. The show doesn't deserve one. This is all I'm going to say: they played too many new songs, not enough good ones, they completely fucked up Bullet With Butterfly Wings by playing it three times too fast, and, on top of all that, they had the audacity to do that trendy half-an-hour-of-ambient-noise bullshit which seems to be the go with bands these days. If I want to listen to ambient noise I'll go to a Tool concert. At least they have the courtesy of walking off stage for twenty minutes so you know you can relax and take a piss or whatever. But here was Billy Corgan, last seen on these shores when I was still learning my times-tables, and he's got the nerve to keep everyone waiting while he shows us he can use an effects pedal.
Why don't these bands learn to quit while they're on top? It's a question that's puzzled me for years. In any case, next time I put on a Pumpkins album I'll make sure to erase the memory of last night for fear of polluting my experience. I suggest you do the same.
Being a freelance journalist is…
Tuesday, March 25, 2008
Lonely Planet Bluelist - Seven ways to feel at home in Italy
1. Embrace God.
Cigarettes are appetite suppressants so if you begin chain-smoking it means you’ll only need to eat once a day. This is necessary in cities like
At first glance,
This is to ensure a placid disposition when your friendly Florentine bus-driver decides to practice his Need for Speed moves on the busy night-time roads. There are some traffic cops in
Cities like
This is to inconspicuously separate yourself from the large group of inebriated Contiki kids that you’ll bump into every four hours in every major city. You need to get as far away from these untoward people as possible, before one of them recognises your un-Italian-like features and starts trying to talk to you. Also, avoid 'discotheques'. This is Italian slang for 'tourist clubs', which usually consist of Vodka shots and the Grease soundtrack on repeat. If you want to experience authentic Italian nightlife, just do what they do: hire a Moped and hoon around town, yelling at the occasional passer-by.
Italians may look sober, but they’re not. If you end up somewhere like
A piece on Australian author John Flanagan
Will is the creation of John Flanagan, the bestselling Australian children's author who has just struck a seven figure deal with United Artists Films to turn his fantasy Ranger’s Apprentice series into
“I’ve wanted to be an author for a really long time. I’ve always dreamed of making my living from telling stories, because it’s what I love,” Flanagan says. “I love the fact that I can say I'm an author when asked what I do. I even love writing it on immigration forms when I fly overseas.”
We're sitting in Flanagan's living room in Manly, on a deliciously stormy Friday afternoon – the perfect time for talking about books.
“I’ve had books rejected by publishers before, and I know what it’s like to hold your breath waiting for something to happen. One day things are magical; the next they’re in tatters. You can’t let things like this go to your head,” he says of the film deal. “Although I did take my wife shopping the second we were told the news.” Flanagan wants to stop right there for a moment. He directs me into the study so I may see his writing cabin, a small wooden construct perched on a second level of his backyard.
“I decided I needed my own shack, somewhere where I could drown myself in the world I’ve created. It’s where all my characters come to life.”
The Ranger’s Apprentice books began as something of a flight of fancy for Flanagan.
Nineteen years ago Flanagan’s son Michael was a little lacking in confidence, and the aspiring author felt the only way he could help his twelve-year-old son was by telling him a story. The story was about a boy just like Michael, shy and timid, but also brave and quick-witted. This turned into the story of Will – the character that’s earned Flanagan the reverence of teenagers worldwide.
Over a period of five months Flanagan wrote a new story for Michael every week. First there was Will, the agile hero of the books, then Will's mentor, Halt, and finally Horace, Will's best friend. Flanagan set the action of the stories in the
“I wanted to base the central character on Michael, and write about the things he was interested in, like archery,” Flanagan says. “I even illustrated them for him – anything to get him to read! Then I got involved in a TV show and put the stories aside. Every now and then I'd take them out and fiddle with them."
Flanagan began life in advertising, switching to a brief stint filling is as a creative director and then making the move to television, where he worked for eight years as a writer on the Australian sitcom Hey Dad! While his days were busy in the corporate world, Flanagan filled his spare time by writing manuscripts, mostly adult thrillers, and indulging in his second passion of making music. This took precedence when he began working from home writing corporate jingles, and it was during this time at home with his kids when Flanagan finally decided to do something about Michael’s stories. The development of the original 20 short stories into a series of books took place over a number of years - most of the stories were incorporated as chronicles in the first Ranger's Apprentice book.
"Having had books rejected before, I wasn't getting my hopes up too much when my agent Rachel Skinner first approached Random House with the Ranger's Apprentice manuscript. We had decided to make it [the manuscript] a little more presentable, so we put the synopsis on a glossy page with a picture of an archer; it was a brochure. Two weeks later I was out in Dee Why buying something for my guitar when Rachel rang. She said to me ‘John, are you sitting down?’” Flanagan laughs. “This was a phrase that she began using every time there was big news to break. So I went outside the shop, sat down, and she told me that Random House had offered to buy the first two books."
But Flanagan knew better than to give up his day job just yet. His first book signing, after the first Ranger’s Apprentice book was published in 2004, did not quite go to plan. Flanagan sat awkwardly at a card table in Manly’s shopping district, waiting for someone to show up.
“I was waiting, in vain, for hours. I was waiting for someone. Anyone. Finally some guy came up to me, picked up the book, looked at me, shook his head, and dropped the book back on the table and left. I almost died.”
Luckily for Flanagan – and Will – it was a one-time hiccup. The years that followed produced an English agent for the Ranger's Apprentice series, followed by a
“The thing about these books is they're fast-paced. They're exciting and adventurous and have very likeable characters that the reader can identify with,” Flanagan says.
“I love the fact that the Ranger's Apprentice books bring in reluctant readers. This woman came up to me at a book signing in Bundaberg and burst into tears, thanking me for bringing her wayward son back to her by writing this book. I got pretty emotional too, so we both sat there crying like idiots. You just feel fabulous when this stuff happens, when you think that all you did was set out to entertain. I get a lot of emails from kids telling me the same thing; the ones that are wonderful are the e-mails that are so badly spelt they're almost unreadable. And that's the real icing on the cake.”
Late November last year Flanagan received a phone call from his
"Haggis? I said. Who's Haggis?" Flanagan remembers, laughing. “I had no idea who Paul Haggis was.”
Paul Haggis, the Academy Award-winning director of Crash and screenplay writer for movies like Million Dollar Baby and Letters from Iwo Jima, had shown interest in directing the movie adaptations of the Ranger’s Apprentice books.
“The studio sent through his CV and after a quick Google search I knew all about him. I was blown away by all the stuff he’s done, especially one of his earlier series, Due South, which I absolutely love.”
Flanagan’s guess is that any book which spends longer than a week on the New York Times bestseller's list will get the attention of a
"He told me he loved the books. He'd read them to his nine-year-old son, and he would be working on the screenplay with his daughter, who has written some television and was also a big fan of children's fantasy."
A couple of weeks later United Artists Films signed the deal, at the same time making it quite clear that Flanagan was to have absolutely no creative control. So how does a writer feel about putting all his hard work into the hands of a complete stranger?
“I know my baby is in good hands,” Flanagan jokes. “I’ve spoken to Paul and I’m confident he’s not going to screw it up too much. Besides, I know how this whole thing works in
Being an author means discipline. Flanagan’s routine is simple: after waking up and drinking his coffee, he marches up to his backyard writing cabin at
“I've always written in the morning, I don't know why. I tend to think about things in the afternoon and let them wash through my mind and I know if I do my writing in the morning I'll do it quicker and better.”
“I toy with an idea for a few months before I actually sit down to write anything. By now I've fallen well and truly in love with the Ranger's Apprentice characters so I automatically know where they're going and what they're going to do,” he says.
From then on the writing process begins; from rough notes to a story board written on post-it notes for easy manoeuvring, the process is methodical and efficient. Next: the big events – the highs, the lows of the plot and the setting of each book.
"Sometimes the settings come to me from obscure places, an Irish countryside or a drowned forest in
But sometimes readers forget it’s all a little bit of make-believe.
“It’s true that my characters often show traits and behaviours that may appear to be anachronisms. For example, a few of them are addicted to coffee. This is because I am too and I sympathise with them when they wake up in a cold camp with no fire. I once got this email from a very angry lady who told me that they didn't drink coffee in medieval times – they drank herbal tea! Can you imagine? A bunch of warriors drinking herbal tea? I don't think so. I wanted to be able to invent my own history, and not be hidebound by real events and political alliances. I opted for a fantasy world, based on the one we know. That's the best part about writing fantasy.”
The not-so-great part about writing fantasy is that Flanagan has had to restrain himself from reading any. The reason for this is simple enough: you never know when someone else’s idea is going to interfere with your own, and authors like Flanagan have to be careful about reading anything even remotely similar to what they are writing. The copyright laws are very strict, and consequently very damaging. Not to mention the realisation that you have to retire your vision due to someone else doing something similar.
Flanagan says this happened to him while he was reading the first Harry Potter book.
“I discovered the same two boys/one girl relationship that I had been planning for my books all along," he says, eyebrows furrowing. “So I just stopped reading, then and there. I didn't want to know where she [JK Rowling] was taking her story, because I knew exactly where I was taking mine.”
The same problem occurs when a fan of Flanagan’s sends him fan fiction – stories about the characters and settings written by fans of the original work.
“I'm actually quite scared of it you know, because ideas can pop up from weird places and you just never know. Kids love it [fan fiction] but I can't afford to encourage it because what it is, let's face it, is infringement of copyright.”
Flanagan relates a story about JK Rowling, something he's presumably heard on the author's grapevine.
"A woman came up to JK Rowling at a book signing and handed her an envelope. When JK put out her hand to take it, one of her minders quickly snatched it away. At the end of the session JK naturally asked what all the fuss was about and she was told, in the most severe manner, that the envelope probably contained a story, and there was no way in the world that her should go anywhere near this envelope. Because if at any time JK writes a story similar to the one handed to her by that woman… well, you can imagine the consequences. She could be sued for millions."
I look stunned.
"Believe, me it's happened," Flanagan replies.
Flanagan is a family man. He admits he has always looked towards those closes to him for inspiration, guidance and, most of all, motivation. Flanagan’s son Michael, who is now 31 and lives in
“This was much needed motivation for me,” Flanagan laughs, showing me some family photos. “I thought gee, if Penny can do it, then I should be able to! It’s great how we’ve always managed to push each other on like that and applied just the right amount of scepticism to each other’s work.”
And speaking of scepticism, just what does Flanagan think about the proposed film version of Ranger’s Apprentice?
“There are concerns, you know. I think the most crucial elements will be the casting and use of CGI. There's no need for that stuff. There are no big battle scenes, the armies aren't big. There aren't ten thousand Orcs charging to the centre of Middle Earth. I want this to be character-driven with as few special effects as possible. I'm glad Paul is directing because he's Canadian so there’s no chance of him misinterpreting the great Australian sense of irony,” Flanagan says. Oh, and one more thing…
“I hope nobody ever, ever, shoots a bow horizontally!”
John Flanagan is currently writing book eight of the Ranger’s Apprentice series and has already planned book number nine.
How toddlers can help us to build more human robots (published Thursday, February 14 in The Guardian)
Move over, laptops. It's robots that have been tipped as the next-generation classroom aide. The first long-term interactive study investigating the potential use of robots on early childhood education has produced some surprising results.
Led by Javier Movellan from the University of California's Institute for Neural Computation in San Diego, the study tested four robots by introducing them into a classrooms of toddlers aged between 18 months and two years.
In one of the experiments, a 2ft robot was programmed to walk around the room, using its sensors to navigate, as well as react to the toddlers by sitting down, giggling when it was touched and lying down when its batteries faded. Once the toddlers had familiarised themselves with the robot, they began to treat it with care and attention - hugging it, helping it up when it fell down and covering it with a blanket when its batteries ran out. Movellan says this is an encouraging reaction.
In a class of its own
"The children don't seem to have a problem adjusting to the capabilities of the robot very quickly, learning what it can and cannot do, and acting accordingly," Movellan says. "Overall we are finding that the children treat the robots as social beings, but somewhat special. They don't treat them as toys, but they also don't treat them as if they were humans."
But how do the robots compare with pets? The analogy is a decidedly good one - both robots and pets are, in the eyes of a toddler, a special creature whose properties are not known ahead of time, and only by interacting with it can these be found out. Movellan and his team did not compare the toddlers' behaviour towards pets to their behaviour towards the robots due to the complex operational properties that any robots intended for use in the classroom would have.
"I think the message is that children this age very quickly figured out the operational properties of the robot and adjusted accordingly. As such the robot was a class on its own - neither a toy, nor a pet, nor a peer, but something in between. The interesting thing of course is that the robot was not 'alive' in the standard sense of the word, yet it was treated as a live being, raising the interesting scientific question of what it means to be alive and how do we recognise that something is alive."
Measuring the interaction between the robots and the toddlers proved a difficult challenge for the research team. After a few unsuccessful attempts, the team settled on two approaches: the first entailed multiple people assessing in real time the quality of the observed interaction using a computer joystick; the second was simply counting target behaviours such as how many times the toddlers touched the robots, and where they touched them. The team then watched videos of the various interactions throughout the study and concluded that the toddlers responded better to the robots over several months.
"The toddlers' reactions have been a constant source of information, and surprise to us, particularly during the first years of the project," Movellan says. "One thing that became apparent to us was the importance of timing. When you get the timing right, magic happens. When you get it wrong, it disappears. Simply moving the robot's head too slow or too fast can make a difference on the appearance or disappearance of social behaviours towards the robot. We are working on robots that can automatically detect the different moods the classroom goes through and adjust their behaviour accordingly."
Movellan says the results of the study prove that technology is very close to producing robots that can interact with humans in a social manner. "Rapid progress is possible but we need to think differently than the way traditional AI and industrial robotics used to think."
Using toddlers in the study instead of older children was a strategic move - the team felt that interaction with toddlers would help them focus on the affective aspects of the interaction while avoiding speech. With speech recognition technology not yet ready to be used in a noisy classroom, toddlers proved to be a perfect solution because they use speech sparsely yet they can still achieve meaningful forms of social interaction.
"Toddlers are a very good model for the robots we want to develop. They're very good critics, and by choosing to interact or not interact with the robots they let us know exactly whether or not we are making progress."
Scientific motivation
By carrying out this study, Movellan and his team have proved it possible to use robots as teaching aides. The aim of the study was to develop systems that could assist teachers in a personal manner. Movellan says the main scientific motivation was to understand what it takes to develop robots that can interact with people.
"The social benefits of using robots to interact with toddlers are numerous. I like to think of robots as intelligent toys that can help enrich the life of children, both from a cognitive point of view as well as a personal one," Movellan says.
"The interaction we observed between the children and the robots definitely had a very positive effect in the classroom atmosphere and the overall sense of happiness of the children."
But Movellan is careful to point out that robots can never be a substitute for human interaction. "It's true that we can say the same thing about pets and toys. Personally, I like the physicality that robots bring when compared to videogames and television."
Movellan and his team are now focusing on experiments that they hope will prove that robots will make effective teaching tools. They will continue bringing robots to schools and refining them to improve their social intelligence. The team is also planning to build an infant robot to approximate the complexity of human infants.
"Our goal with this is to reverse engineer the developmental process infants go through during the first year of life. We want to figure out how it is that they seamlessly solve problems that elude the most sophisticated AI programs," he says.
Peer-to-peer network invites drivers to get connected (published Thursday, January 17, 2008 in The Guardian)
The name BitTorrent has become part of most people's day-to-day vernacular, synonymous with downloading every kind of content via the internet's peer-to-peer networks. But if a team of US researchers have their way, we may all be talking about CarTorrent in the not too distant future.
Researchers from the University of California Los Angeles are working on a wireless communication network that will allow cars to talk to each other, simultaneously downloading information in the shape of road safety warnings, entertainment content and navigational tools.
The UCLA Engineering's Network Research Lab team, led by Mario Gerla and Giovanni Pau, hit upon the idea in 2004, when peer-to-peer networking took off fuelled by applications such as BitTorrent. "We had the idea from BitTorrent, and decided to extend BitTorrent to cars under the name of CarTorrent. One of our dreams had always been to apply the technology to civilian applications," says Gerla. "Imagine you're driving to a beach resort and want to find out what the best beaches are. You could stop at a gas station and download several video clips from an internet access point, but that's not very convenient."
Wireless at the wheel
Gerla and his team instead propose to connect cars to one another using the wireless networking platform they're developing, which could be up and running by as early as 2012.
The wireless network would allow moving vehicles within 100 metres and 300 metres of each other to connect and create a network with a wide range. The network would then allow drivers to download information from internet access points simply by driving by, and then share that information with other cars on the road.
Gerla says the benefits of such a network are numerous: "There will be immediate benefits in driving safety as well as in content distribution. Car-to-car communications can be used to avoid accidents by alerting the drivers of imminent danger. To prevent a crash we must act in fractions of a second. We are currently collaborating with vehicle manufacturers to help reduce accidents and fatalities on the road. For this latter application, vehicles are equipped with sensing devices, such as radars and video cameras."
The network uses standard radio protocols such as Digital Short Range Communication, or DSRC, combined with wireless LAN technology at 5.9GHz (not Wi-Fi's 2.4GHz) to create networks between vehicles equipped with onboard sensing devices. These devices can gather safety-related information as well as other complex multimedia data.
By far the most essential aspect of this network, though, is that it is not subject to memory, processing, storage and energy limitations like traditional sensor networks. Instead, it relies on the resources of the vehicle itself, along with those vehicles around it.
Under the scheme, cars would be able to use their onboard radios to exchange three categories of information: safe navigation (such as reporting on icy road conditions, traffic jams and possible collisions ahead), content distribution (locally relevant information, advertisements and videos of upcoming attractions) and urban surveillance (collecting information which could be used later by police for forensic investigations).
Gerla and his team are already collaborating with car manufacturers such as Toyota and BMW on bringing the project to life. However, costs and industry standards are the more important hurdles that this network will have to jump before it can become feasible. Gerla says the network can be slowly implemented, just as GPS navigation systems and Wi-Fi-style radios have slowly started to become standard equipment.
"What will turn the tide will be the approval and widespread adoption of the emerging standards for car-to-car communications sponsored by the IEEE 802.11p Working Committee of the IEEE [the professional association for the advancement of technology]," says Gerla.
"A few years ago, leading car manufacturers decided to join forces with national government agencies in the Vehicle Information Infrastructure Consortium, which works closely with the IEEE 802.11p Committee, to develop communications architecture to help drivers anticipate hazardous events or avoid bad traffic areas."
However, Gerla says the network is not without faults: "The two most critical aspects that could go wrong if the network is implemented are location privacy, because drivers do not want others to know where they are; and attacks where a driver could maliciously inject wrong traffic congestion information to persuade other drivers to get out of its way."
Defensive drivers
With costs currently estimated at around $500 (£255) per car for the implementation of the equipment required to connect to the network, drivers probably won't be clamouring to get the kit.
"Most likely, there will be at least initially two types of drivers," Gerla says. "The drivers enamoured with high-tech features will immediately embrace this technology. But it's true that less aggressive drivers, probably a sizeable fraction of the population, will be reluctant to embrace the technology at first."
That, of course, could present a problem for the growth of CarTorrent: for as anyone who has tried using BitTorrent will know, there's no point in being the only person on a peer-to-peer network. Being the first car to use CarTorrent will be an expensive and pointless exercise. But like a telephone - and the internet - it's the sort of technology whose benefits will multiply rapidly as long as more people use it.